Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 F.1d 964 - Alferitz v. Ingalls

Alferitz v. Ingalls’s Empirical Analysis

83 F. 964 · 1897

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 1950
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1950

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

201897190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Douglass v. County of Pike · Ferguson v. Clifford · Gregory v. Thomas · Simpson v. Ferguson · Hill v. . Beebe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule is that the description in a chattel mortgage need not he so specific and certain that the property might he identified hy the description alone. If the description of the personal property contained in the chattel mortgage is such as will enable third persons to identify the property, aided hy the inquiry which the .mortgage itself indicates and directs, the mortgage, when recorded, is constructive notice to all third parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Written descriptions of property are to be interpreted in the light of the facts known to and in the minds of the parties at the time. They are not prepared for strangers, hut for those they are to affect — the parties and their privies. A subsequent purchaser or mortgagee is supposed to acquire a knowledge of all the faets, so far as may be needful for his protection, and he purchases in view' of that knowledge.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.