In re Paramount Publix Corp.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1936.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1936-05-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1940

1 federal appellate ·

4 counsel of record

Relies on In Re Paramount-Publix Corporation

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1936-05-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Root, Clark & Buckner and Root, Clark, Buckner & Ballantine, all of New York City, for appellants.

¶2Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, of New York City (Thomas D. Thacher, Edwin L. Weisl, and Richard Jones, III, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Paramount Pictures, Inc.

¶3Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Order (12 F.Supp. 823) affirmed.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Judge

PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

Root, Clark & Buckner and Root, Clark, Buckner & Ballantine, all of New York City, for appellants.

Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, of New York City (Thomas D. Thacher, Edwin L. Weisl, and Richard Jones, III, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Paramount Pictures, Inc.

Cook, Nathan & Lehman, of New York City, for stockholders’ committee.

Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, of New York City (Thomas D. Thacher, Edwin L. Weisl, and Richard Jones, III, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Paramount Pictures, Inc.