Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 F.2d 129 - Kullman & Co. v. Woolley

Kullman & Co. v. Woolley’s Empirical Analysis

83 F.2d 129 · 1936

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
August 1998
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 1998

11 federal appellate ·

501936194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1 · 12 U.S.C. § 91 · 12 U.S.C. § 95 · 12 U.S.C. § 95B

Relies on Toof v. Martin · Dutcher v. Wright · McDonald v. Chemical National Bank · National Security Bank v. Butler · Wager v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A bank is in contemplation of insolvency when the fact becomes reasonably apparent to its officers that the concern will presently be unable to meet its obligations, and will be obliged to suspend its ordinary operations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.