Van Dyke v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
83 F.2d 35 · 1936
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1983
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bradley Palmer v. State of Texas · Scudder v. Union National Bank · Montgomery Bell v. James Morrison Anthony Butler and Jonathan Taylor · United States v. Title Insurance & Trust Co. · Railroad Companies v. Schutte
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well established that in determining the period of limitations applicable to actions at law, the federal courts are governed by local statutes as interpreted by the highest courts of the respective States. Bell v. Morrison, 1 Pet. 351 , 26 U.S. 351, 359, 360, 363 , 7 L.Ed. 174 ; Graham v. Englemann, D.C., 263 F. 166, 168 . See, also, Palmer v. Texas, 212 U.S. 118, 131 , 29 S.Ct. 230 , 53 L.Ed. 435 .” Van Dyke v. Parker, 9 Cir., 1936, 83 F.2d 35, 37 . See Campbell v. City of Haverhill, 155 U.S. 610 , 15 S.Ct. 217 , 39 L.Ed. 280 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Matters bearing upon the execution, the interpretation and the vaildity of a contract are determined by the law of the place where the contract is made. Matters connected with its performance are regulated by the law prevailing at the place of performance. Matters respecting the remedy, such as the bringing of suits, admissibility of evidence, statutes of limitation, depend upon the law of the place where the suit is brought.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ross v. Ross
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.