Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 F.2d 585 - Hecht Co. v. Hohensee

Hecht Co. v. Hohensee’s Empirical Analysis

83 F.2d 585 · 1936

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
5
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2007 · most notably Smith v. District of Columbia (1951), Lyons v. District of Columbia (1954)

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

9019361940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mahoney v. Perreault · Taggart v. Bouldin · Norville v. Hub Furniture Co. · Arning v. Druding

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Norville v. Hub Furniture Co., 59 App.D.C. 29 , 32 F.(2d) 420 , we held that, in the absence of statutory provision to the contrary, the owner or occupant of property owes no duty to pedestrians to keep the sidewalk in front of it free from icé and snow coming thereon from natural causes; nor does a storekeeper owe any greater duty in this regard to customers: leaving his store than he owes to ordinary pedestrians.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] landowner cannot be held liable if he shovels snow from the sidewalk in front of his premises upon the space between the outer edge of the walk and the curb and it melts and runs over the walk and thereafter ice is formed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.