National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.’s Empirical Analysis
83 F.2d 731 · 1936
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1983
13 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 22 (§ 12 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 161 (§ 11 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Eastman Kodak Co of New York v. Southern Photo Materials Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“less activities than those of the respondents here”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.