Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

83 F.2d 99

Docket No. 3998.

United States v. Derrick

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1936.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1936-04-15

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1936-04-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 1965

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

301936194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Armistead L. Boothe, Atty., Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C., and E. P. Riley, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Greenville, S. C. (Chas. C. Wyche, U. S. Atty., of Greenville, S. C., Will G. Beardslee, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, D. C., Wilbur C. Pickett, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and Young M. Smith, Atty., Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C, on the brief), for appellant.

¶2Calhoun A. Mays, of Greenwood, S. C. (Hood & Hood, of Anderson, S. C, and Mays & Featherstone, of Greenwood, S. C., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before PARKER, NORTHCOTT, and SOPER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff oil a policy of government insurance. The insured alleged that he became totally and permanently disabled on February 19, 1931, and the only question raised by the appeal is whether verdict should not have been directed for the government on this issue. The evidence shows’ that the insured has suffered since his discharge from the Army with neurocirculatory asthenia, and that he is at all times partially disabled as a result of this disease and' that sometimes his disability is total.' There is no sufficient showing, however, of permanent total disability. On the contrary, he successfully operated a restaurant over a number of years following his discharge from the Army, and since 1930 has had supervision of a farm which he owns and which is worked by share croppers. Although not able to do heavy farm work, he cannot be said to be totally and permanently disabled within any fair meaning of these terms; and verdict should have been directed for the government.

¶6Reversed.

/83/f2d/99 · .json · Public domain