Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 F.3d 1060 - Marbled Murrelet v. Babbitt

Marbled Murrelet v. Babbitt’s Empirical Analysis

83 F.3d 1060 · 1996

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
5
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 12 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Ellis (1998), United States v. Gaskin (2004)

23 federal appellate · 12 district · 5 state decisions

5001996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1531 (§ 2 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1532 (§ 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1540 (§ 11 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Frye v. United States · Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore. · Bolker v. Commissioner · Sierra Club v. Babbitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an intentional or negligent act or omission which creates the likelihood of injury to wildlife by annoying it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] reasonably certain threat of imminent harm to a protected species is sufficient for issuance of an injunction under section 9 of the ESA”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “By failing to object to evidence at trial and request a ruling on such an objection, a party waives the right to raise admissibility issues on appeal.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.