Does 1 v. Chandler’s Empirical Analysis
83 F.3d 1150 · 1996
Citation profile
115 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 183 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Lee v. City of Los Angeles (2001), A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. (2001)
115 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Weinberger v. Salfi · United States v. Morton · Miller National Labor Relations Board v. California Pacific Medical Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 183 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“necessarily abuses its discretion when it bases its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact.”
21 later decisions quote this exact passage“For the purposes of equal protection analysis, the disabled do not constitute a suspect class.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“where the district court is alleged to have relied on erroneous legal premises, review is plenary.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Northwest Airlines Inc v. Vora · 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7317, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,810 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of American Commerce National Bank v. Gerald J. Garner Joan Garner, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of American Commerce National Bank v. Daniel Garner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.