Kaul v. Stephan’s Empirical Analysis
83 F.3d 1208 · 1996
Citation profile
207 federal appellate · 25 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 335 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (1998), Simms v. Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (1999)
207 federal appellate · 25 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Leon · Malley v. Briggs · Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · McClanahan v. State Tax Commission of Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 335 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
64 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“affirm the district court's decision to grant summary judgment if the record contains any basis to do so.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.