Kollar’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2025
2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Soberon v. United States · Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris · Reiter v. Cooper · Latimer v. Stainer · Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To prove the falsity of the representations, Plaintiffs would have to show that the relevant seniority provisions of the CBA, the transfer agreement, and modifying letter agreement, differ from the representations made by the Union.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“), 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-188 . Because we conclude that the fraud claim is preempted, we affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 Edward Kollar and his fellow plaintiffs (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“) were employed by Southern Pacific Railroad and were members of the United Transportation Union (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.