King v. Briggs’s Empirical Analysis
83 F.3d 1384 · 1996
Citation profile
23 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably Yates v. Merit Systems Protection Board (1998), Middleton v. Department of Defense (1999)
23 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · United States v. Lopez · Waldau v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“without regard to the provisions of Title 5 governing appointments in the competitive service, or the provisions ... of such title relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The scope of the Board's jurisdiction presents a question of law that we review de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.