United States v. Silver’s Empirical Analysis
83 F.3d 289 · 1996
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2014
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3564 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 41 U.S.C. § 53
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg · Herrmann v. United States · Nogueras v. Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““These courts believed that the extension of probation is not as ‘grievous’ a ‘loss’ as revocation and did not implicate a liberty interest sufficient to require additional procedural protections. [Citations omitted.] These courts reasoned that the loss of liberty in an extension proceeding is only a potential one and that the judge in an extension proceeding need not make a detailed factual inquiry into whether the probationer committed a violation, but only must determine what is in the best interest of society. [Citations omitted.]” 83 F.3d at 292 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gordon“These courts believed that the extension of probation is not as “grievous” a “loss” as revocation and did not implicate a liberty interest sufficient to require additional procedural protections. These courts reasoned that the loss of liberty in an extension proceeding is only a potential one and that the judge in an extension proceeding need not make a detailed factual inquiry into whether the probationer committed a violation, but only must determine what is in the best interest of society.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Whether procedural protections are necessary ‘depends on the extent to which an individual would be condemned to suffer grievous loss.’ [Citation omitted]. In Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 , 93 S. Ct. 1756 , 36 L. Ed. 2d 656 (1973), the Supreme Court held that due process requires that an individual on probation be given notice and the right to hearing prior to his parole being revoked. Id. at 782 , 92 S. Ct. at 1759-60.” 83 F.3d at 291 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gordon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.