Barney v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
83 F.3d 318 · 1996
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Balogun v. United States Attorney General (2002), United States v. Pina-Jaime (2003)
15 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1259 (§ 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Landon v. Plasencia · Leng May Ma v. Barber · Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corp. v. J.L.M. Construction Co. · Desir v. Ilchert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]t the time of parole, as distinguished from the time of advance parole, [a petitioner] was an excludable alien like all aliens who seek admission to the United States at designated ports of entry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although Petitioner received advance parole—a promise of parole upon her return—while she was an illegal overstay, she was not `paroled' until she returned to the United States from [abroad].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“advance parole gave petitioner the right to return for the purpose of completing her Adjustment Application; it did not `freeze' her status as an illegal overstay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.