Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

83 F.3d 416

Docket No. 95-7975.

United States v. Gary C. Crouch

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 15, 1996. Decided: April 30, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-04-30

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 1996 · most notably United States v. Hughes L (1996), United States v. Louis (1996)

33 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-04-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Gary C. Crouch, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, SC, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Crouch, Nos. CR-91-397; CR-91-310; CA-94-3237-3-19BC (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/83/f3d/416 · .json · Public domain