Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 F.3d 537 - Gill v. Thomas

Gill v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

83 F.3d 537 · 1996

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably O'Rourke v. City of Providence (2001), United States of America v. George Varoudakis (2000)

17 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

1801996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Scharffe v. Perkins · Corallo v. United States · Verderber v. Cantello Plumbing Corp. · West Virginia State Department of Tax & Revenue v. Internal Revenue Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to the admissibility of the [prior] conviction[ ] for this appeal, [he] should have refrained from offering the evidence himself, waited to see if [Williams] introduced [it] ..., and if so, objected then. In sum, [Wilson's] own action of offering the ... evidence himself rendered it admissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “cannot rely solely on his in limine objection to preserve the evidentiary issue for appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “] may have been a wise tactical decision, as a consequence, [the plaintiff]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.