United States v. Hui’s Empirical Analysis
83 F.3d 592 · 1996
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1115 · 18 U.S.C. § 3584 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Tropiano · United States v. Quinones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he district court may abjure the concurrent sentence paradigm set forth in § 5G1.2 . . . . Its decision to do so constitutes an upward departure”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the intentional grounding of the ship made it not only foreseeable, but likely, that deaths would result”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.