Fleming v. Crane

¶1 IT IS ORDERED that the motion by Mittie Fleming for reconsideration of the Deputy Clerk’s order denying her leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) is DENIED. Payment of the appellate filing fee would not be an undue hardship. See Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339, 69 S.Ct. 85, 93 L.Ed. 43 (1948). Additionally, Fleming has not shown a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Carson v. Polley 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir.1982). The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.