Easter v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 29 U.S.C. § 254 · 47 U.S.C. § 153
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Mead Corp. · National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services · Poland v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Federal Circuit’s adherence to the rule of stare decisis in Adams ... was not contrary to the Court’s holding in [Brand X] because it did not ignore OPM interpretations of a government regulation made after the Federal Circuit had decided Bobo . Likewise, this court would not be violating the rule of [Brand X ] by following Adams ... because plaintiffs do not rely on a new OPM regulation interpreting home-to-work driving under the FLSA issued subsequent to that decision. Because the issues in [Brand Z] are readily distinguishable from the issues in this case, the court fails to see how the Supreme Court’s decision in [Brand Z] could vitiate the binding precedent of Adams____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.