Sharp v. Coopers’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78F (§ 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 26 U.S.C. § 1231 · 26 U.S.C. § 263 (Interest Equalization Tax Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 752
Relies on Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Topsy's International, Inc. v. Seiffer · Board of Education of the City School District of Cincinnati v. Bronson · Thomas v. Duralite Co. · United States v. Natelli
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the correct measure of damages under § 28 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(a), is the difference between the fair value of all that the seller received and the fair value of what he would have received had there been no fraudulent conduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the difference between the price (plaintiffs) paid for their investment and what it was actually worth at the time of purchase.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“from suitable banks or other lending agencies”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.