83 F. Supp. 2d 58 - Cothran v. Dalton’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 860 · 10 U.S.C. § 869 · 10 U.S.C. § 892 · 10 U.S.C. § 938 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 5 U.S.C. § 701
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Bruton v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Edwards v. Balisok · Burns v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no case law suggesting that [Mr. Scott] has a right under either constitutional or military law to such a hearing or that the convening officer may not conduct a more limited form of investigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“could, if it considered it necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice, completely expunge all reference to a court-martial ever having occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“essentially an evidentiary hearing to resolve collateral factual issues, usually ordered by an appellate military court ... to aid in appellate review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.