83 Ill. 2d 521 - In Re Cohen’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act)
Relies on 78 Ill. 2d 276 - In Re Clayter · 77 Ill. 2d 154 - In Re Wigoda · 69 Ill. 2d 355 - In Re Kien · 82 Ill. 2d 489 - In Re Zahn · 64 Ill. 2d 398 - In Re Leonard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) the nature of the misconduct for which the petitioner was disciplined; (2) the maturity and experience of the petitioner at the time discipline was imposed; (3) whether the petitioner recognizes the nature and seriousness of the misconduct; (4) when applicable, whether petitioner has made restitution; (5) the petitioner’s conduct since discipline was imposed; and (6) the petitioner’s candor and forthrightness in presenting evidence in support of the petition.” 107 Ill. 2d R. 767(f).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.