Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 IND 546 - Axtel v. Chase

Axtel v. Chase’s Empirical Analysis

1882

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
January 1917
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 1917

17 state decisions

1101882189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Teter v. Hinders · McCarnan v. Cochran · Eichbredt v. Angerman · Potter v. Earnest · Krutsinger v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The appellants were brought into court for the purpose of compelling them to pay their debt, and, being in court because of this failure, they are asked, incidentally, to correct the mortgage. No demand.upon them to correct the mortgage was necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.