Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 KAN 484 - Quinton v. Adams

Quinton v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1966
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1966

4 state decisions

20191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The affairs of men are too varied to permit them to occupy their homesteads every moment of time. Duty, necessity or even pleasure may occasion extended absences which will not defeat the exemption. But it must appear from the circumstances that an absence in fact is genuinely temporary or the homestead privilege is lost. Otherwise the words of the constitution and statute which require not only occupancy, but occupancy as a family residence, would be deprived of all force.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““All the evidence considered, the appellee’s claimed intention to occupy the land in controversy as a residence for his family is refuted.” (p. 488.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.