Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 MDAPP 389 - Traverso v. State

Traverso v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp. · Presbyterian Church v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church · Tichnell v. State · Chisley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For a killing to be “wilful” there must be a specific purpose and intent to kill; to be “deliberate” there must be a full and conscious knowledge of the purpose to kill; and to be “premeditated” the design to kill must have preceded the killing by an appreciable length of time, that is, time enough to be deliberate. It is unnecessary that the deliberation or premeditation shall have existed for any particular length of time. Their existence is discerned from the facts of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.