State v. . Reese’s Empirical Analysis
1880
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2018
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general rule the same degree of certainty in the description of the goods obtained, in indictments for obtaining goods under false pretences, is required as in the description of goods alleged to be stolen, in larceny.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Crowder“the money obtained should have been described at least by the amount, as for instance so many dollars and cents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'money' without anything added to make it more definite, is too loose in indictments of this kind[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.