83 N.C. App. 69 - State v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 140 N.C. App. 217 - State v. Bowens (2000), 123 N.C. App. 361 - State v. Sisk (1996)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Powell · State v. DeLeonardo · State v. Pope · State v. Whittemore · State v. Effler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his statute ... has been construed to mean only that an indictment may not be amended in a way which `would substantially alter the charge set forth in the indictment.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Ordinarily, the date alleged in the indictment is neither an essential nor a substantial fact, and therefore the State may prove that the offense was actually committed on some date other than that alleged in the indictment without the necessity of a motion to change the bill.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Forte“The failure to state accurately the date or time an offense is alleged to have occurred does not invalidate a bill of indictment nor does it justify reversal of a conviction obtained thereon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Forte
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.