Buerstetta v. Buerstetta’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1958
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Youngson v. Bond · Reischick v. Rieger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is conceded that the authority of the county court in actions to consider wills is confined to the purpose of giving necessary and proper directions to an executor, so that he may effectually execute the intentions of the testator. * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Crane's Estate
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.