Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 Nev. 42 - Ibsen v. State

Ibsen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1992

15 state decisions

701967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · Escobedo v. Illinois · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Massiah v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““2. Any defendant charged with a felony or a gross misdemeanor who is an indigent may, by written application addressed to the district court and delivered to the magistrate, request the appointment of an attorney to represent him. “3. The application shall be accompanied by the defendant’s affidavit, which shall state: “(a) That he is without means of employing an attorney; and “(b) Facts with some particularity, definiteness and certainty concerning his financial disability. “4. The magistrate shall forthwith transmit the application and affidavit to the appropriate judge of the district court. If, after reading the application and affidavit and conducting such further inquiry as he may deem necessary, the judge finds that the defendant is without means of employing an attorney, the judge shall appoint an attorney or designate the public defender to represent him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.