Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

83 N.H. 586

144 A 263

Cohen v. Pienkowski

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 2, 1929

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1929-01-02

Relies on Tuttle v. Dodge · Lee v. Dow

Decided 1929-01-02

Per Curiam.

¶1 The merits of the argument and the sufficiency of the court’s action to overcome its alleged impropriety cannot be considered. As it does not appear affirmatively, and as it is not to be assumed unless it thus appears, that exception was taken relative thereto, the law of the trial was final. Lee v. Dow, 73 N. H. 101, 105. “ Counsel should present his objection in a form calling for a ruling by the court, the presiding justice should allow exceptions only when they relate to a ‘ruling, direction or judgment’ of the court . . . and this court should consider such exceptions only as have been regularly taken.” Tuttle v. Dodge, 80 N. H. 304, 312.

¶2 Case discharged.

/83/nh/586 · .json · Public domain