State v. Bausch’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Walczak v. State (1985), State v. Des Marets (1983)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 15 Cal. 3d 481 - People v. Lent · Dalehite v. United States · 17 Cal. 3d 614 - People v. Richards · State v. Leonardis · State v. Marzolf
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he judiciary has no power . . . to lessen or reduce a sentence where the Legislature has provided a mandatory penalty. . . .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In connection with a plea bargain facts underlying a count which has been dismissed may be considered in fixing the sentence for the conviction, State v. Marzolf, 79 N.J. [167] at 184-185 [ 398 A.2d 849 (1979)], but may not serve as a basis for restitution unless two additional conditions are satisfied. First, there should be a relationship between the restitution and the goal of rehabilitation with respect to the offense for which the defendant is being sentenced. Second, there must be an adequate factual basis supportive of the restitution. ... [T]here be demonstrated to the trial court a showing of the amount due the victim and of the defendant’s ability to repay. [State v. Bausch, 83 N.J. 425, 435 , 416 A.2d 833 (1980).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“not censored versions of his personal history or selected facets of his character,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.