83 N.J. Super. 382 - Grober v. Kahn’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1966
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Otis Elevator Co. · Sunset Beach Amusement Corp. v. Belk · Sarner v. Sarner · United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. United Steelworkers · In Re Caruso
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A partnership estate does not constitute a fund in court for the allowance of attorney's fees within the purview of R.R. 4:55-7(b). Schmerer v. Estate of Kirschenbaum, 39 N.J. Super. 475 ( App. Div. 1956); Blut v. Katz, 36 N.J. Super. 185 ( App. Div. 1955). It logically follows that an accounting action between two joint venturers does not create a `fund in court' within the scope of R.R. 4:55-7(b). Midler v. Heinowitz, 6 N.J. Super. 359, 365 ( App. Div. 1950), affirmed on other grounds 10 N.J. 123 (1952).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“* * * it is not unfair to saddle the full cost of the counsel fees in this litigation upon plaintiff for the reason that plaintiff is doing no more than merely advancing his own interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“services rendered by plaintiff's counsel were to advance the claims of his client and no one else. There can be no clearer case of an adversary proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.