83 Ohio App. 3d 156 - State v. Durbin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"For purposes of this section, a person who issues or transfers a check or other negotiable instrument is presumed to know that it will be dishonored if either of the following occurs: "(1) The drawer had no account with the drawee at the time of issue or the stated date, whichever is later; "(2) The check or other negotiable instrument was properly refused payment for insufficient funds upon presentment within thirty days after issue or the stated date, whichever is later, and the liability of the drawer, indorser, or any party who may be liable thereon is not discharged by payment or satisfaction within ten days after receiving notice of dishonor.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 141 Ohio App. 3d 388 - State v. Edwards

2. “Non-existent accounts and insufficient funds are the two most common reasons why negotiable paper is dishonored, but they are not the only ones, and evidence may be introduced to show that an offender knew an instrument would be dishonored because of some other defect.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Kerr, Wd-08-008 (3-20-2009)

3. “to knowingly obtain, by deception, some benefit for oneself or another, or to knowingly cause, by deception, some detriment to another.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Kerr, Wd-08-008 (3-20-2009)