Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 Ohio App. 3d 163 - Bear v. Geetronics, Inc.

83 Ohio App. 3d 163 - Bear v. Geetronics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc. (1997), 101 Ohio App. 3d 742 - Lynch v. Dial Finance Co. of Ohio No. 1 (1995)

26 state decisions

2401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · 59 Ohio St. 3d 108 - Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd. · Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc. · Bostic v. Connor · Henkel v. Educational Research Council of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(A)(1)(a) If an employee becomes aware in the course of his employment of a violation of any state or federal statute or any ordinance or regulation of a political subdivision that his employer has authority to correct, and the employee reasonably believes that the violation either is a criminal offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to persons or a hazard to public health or safety or is a felony, the employee orally shall notify his supervisor or other responsible officer of his employer of the violation and subsequently shall file with that supervisor or officer a urritten report that provides sufficient detail to identify and describe the violation.” (Emphasis added.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.