83 Ohio App. 3d 216 - Bowman v. Holcomb’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2022
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burris v. Grange Mutual Companies · Tomlinson v. Skolnik · Allstate Insurance v. Diamant · Daley v. United Services Automobile Ass'n · Rolette County v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Based on the commonly accepted definitions of ‘bodily injury,’ ‘sickness’ and ‘disease,’ the judicial trend to exclude non-physical harms such as emotional distress from the term ‘bodily injury’ and the coverage anticipated by the parties in an automobile liability policy, we hold that the Bowmans’ claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress is not a separate ‘bodily injury’ under the Auto- Owners policy.” Bowman v. Holcomb (1992), 83 Ohio App.3d 216, 220 , 614 N.E.2d 838, 841 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.