← 83 Ohio App. 3d 298 - State v. Jackson

83 Ohio App. 3d 298 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

cited by 3 later decisions

states following

April 2009

most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · State v. Bridgeman · 51 Ohio App. 3d 215 - State v. Wolfe · State v. Reed · 38 Ohio App. 3d 84 - State v. Huffman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“A person is under `detention' as that term is used in R.C. 2921.34 , when he is arrested and the arresting officer has established control over his person.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Newman, Unpublished Decision (4-29-2004) · State v. Askew, Unpublished Decision (9-11-2006)
“[c]ontrol can be established by the surrender or submission by the person or by police exertion of control over the person.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Newman, Unpublished Decision (4-29-2004) · State v. Askew, Unpublished Decision (9-11-2006)
“State v. Reed (1981), 65 Ohio St.2d 117 , syllabus.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Newman, Unpublished Decision (4-29-2004) · State v. Askew, Unpublished Decision (9-11-2006)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.