Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 Ohio App. 3d 392 - Plummer v. Hose

83 Ohio App. 3d 392 - Plummer v. Hose’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 40 Ohio App. 2d 179 - Slife v. Kundtz Properties, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) dismissal is procedural in nature and not a judgment on the merits of a case. * * * Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motions test the sufficiency of a complaint; not the merits of the case. Therefore, we pay particular attention to a case as this where a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) dismissal results in a dismissal with prejudice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.