83 Ohio App. 3d 443 - State v. Chitwood’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2023
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on James Edward Kennedy v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden · State v. Widner · State v. Chippendale · O'Shea v. United States · 14 Ohio App. 2d 207 - Goudy v. Dayton Newspapers, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The ultimate question is the degree of prejudice, if any, which such brief exposure caused.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Once the jury was legitimately informed of [appellant’s] criminal past, and particularly the fact that he had already been convicted of the same violent crime for which he was presently on trial, the possibility of any prejudice inuring to him as a result of a brief viewing in shackles * * * became extremely remote.” State v. Chitwood (1992), 83 Ohio App.3d 443, 449 , 615 N.E.2d 257, 261 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.