83 Ohio App. 3d 501 - Crosby v. Beam’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 116 Ohio App. 3d 195 - Gosden v. Louis (1996), 139 Ohio App. 3d 231 - Helman v. Epl Prolong, Inc. (2000)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories · Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp. · Preston v. Murty · Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc. · LeFort v. Century 21-Maitland Realty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]id not mean the damages had to be attributable only to the conspiracy to the exclusion of the underlying tort. It meant that damages, in order to be recoverable under a civil conspiracy claim, cannot be the result of just any tort committed by a conspirator, or just any act committed in furtherance of the conspiracy. They must have been caused by a tort committed in furtherance of the conspiracy. Essentially, this simply restricts the measure of recovery for a conspiracy claim to those damages caused by the underlying tort (or torts) necessary to support the claim for civil conspiracy in the first place.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.