83 Ohio App. 3d 653 - Rogers v. Buckel’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stafford v. Oklahoma · Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc. · 21 Ohio App. 3d 134 - Matalka v. Lagemann · 43 Ohio App. 2d 105 - Thomas H. Maloney & Sons, Inc. v. E. W. Scripps Co. · Embers Supper Club, Inc. v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a false and malicious publication against an individual made with an intent to injure his reputation or to expose him to public hatred, contempt, ridicule, shame, or disgrace or to affect him injuriously in his trade, business or profession. It is defamatory, and actionable at law, if as a proximate consequence of the libel the individual against whom it is published occasions a pecuniary loss.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The right of privacy is the right of a person to be let alone, to be free from unwarranted publicity, and to live without unwarranted interference by the public in matters with which the public is not necessarily concerned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Defamation is a false publication causing injury to a person's reputation ... or affecting him adversely in his trade or business.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.