83 Ohio App. 3d 723 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably 139 Ohio App. 3d 149 - State v. Cooper (2000), State v. Ashburn (1995)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · State v. Thomas · Ohio v. Hymore · State v. Johnston · State v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court has the discretion to determine whether `a reference in the testimony to a forbidden subject merits the extreme remedy of a mistrial.' State v. Jones (1992), 83 Ohio App.3d 723 , 737 , 615 N.E.2d 713 , citing State v. Reynolds (1988), 49 Ohio App.3d 27 , 33 , 550 N.E.2d 490 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.