Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 OHIOLAWABS 92 - Record v. Elking

Record v. Elking’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court is of the opinion that the defendant has the right to compel a physical examination of the plaintiff because the injury complained of is the subject matter of the cause of action. If the defendant desires a medical examination it must be done in the resident county or state of the plaintiff, or any other place where she may be found and by a doctor of defendant's choice. If the examining doctor's testimony is required by the defendant, it may be done so by way of deposition to be used in the trial of the case. Accordingly, the Court will grant the request of the defendant's counsel for a medical examination but will not require plaintiff to come to Cincinnati, Ohio, for that purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.