Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

83 Ohio St. 3d 1437

State v. Madrigal

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1998

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1998-09-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2000

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-09-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Lucas App. No. CR965761. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion for release of portion of record under seal,

¶2IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for release of portion of record under seal be, and hereby is, denied.

Moyer, C.J., concurs and would also strike the sealed portion from the record.Douglas, J., concurs and would also strike the sealed memo.Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs and notes that the court should not consider the portion of record under seal as not part of the record.Pfeifer, J., would review the sealed record and consider releasing then.
/83/ohiost3d/1437 · .json · Public domain