Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 OHIOST3D 41 - State v. Perry

State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
4
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably United States v. Shaffer (2007), 145 Ohio App. 3d 774 - State v. Tamburin (2001)

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

1401998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. · Johnson v. Brown · Dowling v. United States · Data General Corporation v. Grumman Systems Support Corporation · Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A plea of no contest constitutes an admission of the facts alleged in an indictment, as well as the facts set forth by the state in its explanation of the circumstances surrounding the charge, but does not admit that those facts lead to a legal conclusion of guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]o survive a preemption challenge based on equivalency of protected rights, the state law claim must contain an extra element”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'qualitatively different from a copyright infringement claim.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.