State v. Kinney’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

cited by 86 later decisions

states following

March 2026

most recently cited

85 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Moore (2000), State v. Castagnola (2015)

85 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Ybarra v. Illinois · Maryland v. Garrison · Stanford v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“its protections are coextensive with its federal counterpart.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Davis, Unpublished Decision (11-05-2003) · State v. Nazarian, Unpublished Decision (10-13-2004)
“[a] search warrant authorizing the search of `all persons' on a particular premises does not violate the Fourth Amendment requirement of particularity if the supporting affidavit shows probable cause that every individual on the subject premises will be in possession of, at the time of the search, evidence of the kind sought in the warrant.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. McClendon, Ca2006-06-025 (4-9-2007) · State v. Pillar, Unpublished Decision (2-17-2005)
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. McClendon, Ca2006-06-025 (4-9-2007) · State v. Davis, Unpublished Decision (11-05-2003)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.