Klein v. Muhlhausen’s Empirical Analysis
1921
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 1995 · most notably Tinker Investment & Mortgage Corp. v. City of Midwest City (1994), Hartman v. Dunn (1939)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Spurrier Lumber Co. v. Dodson · Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Puckett · Menten v. Richards · Schmucker v. Clifton · Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Christenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is the duty of the court to submit to the jury, and give instructions thereon, any issue, theory, or defense which the evidence tends to support. This right is not affected by the fact that there is countervailing testimony.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doughty v. Laubach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.