Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 Okla. Crim. 188 - State v. Smith

83 Okla. Crim. 188 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2016

15 state decisions

7019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 73 Okla. Crim. 441 - Ex Parte Boyd · 58 Okla. Crim. 88 - Ex Parte Autry · 67 Okla. Crim. 390 - Martin v. State · 74 Okla. Crim. 1 - Ex Parte Banks · 73 Okla. Crim. 18 - Robert Todd v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Statute authorizing court to’ suspend sentence does not authorize the suspension of just a portion of the judgment and sentence, but if suspension is granted it must be of entire judgment. “Act of county court in suspending jail sentence imposed on conviction for unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor upon condition that accused pay fine and costs is unauthorized and the order of the court suspending a part of said judgment and sentence is a nullity.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The prohibition ordinance adopted by the people and made a part of our Constitution prohibits the manufacture, sale, barter, giving away, or otherwise furnishing, or the conveyance of intoxicating liquors from one place within this state to another place therein. In no part of this prohibition ordinance is it made unlawful to have the possession of intoxicating liquor.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.