Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 Okla. Crim. 199 - Ex Parte Smith

83 Okla. Crim. 199 - Ex Parte Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 1974
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1974

7 state decisions

401946195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 70 Okla. Crim. 304 - Ex Parte Meadows · 73 Okla. Crim. 21 - Ex Parte Vanderburg · 83 Okla. Crim. 99 - Ex Parte George

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . The age of the petitioner at the time he is arraigned, his education, background and experience are all factors to be considered in this connection. Where a person has prior thereto served a term of imprisonment in the state penitentiary, the burden upon the petitioner to show that he was not acquainted with court procedure is even greater than it is for one who has never been in the courtroom before his arraignment. . . .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where a prisoner in custody under sentence of conviction seeks to be discharged on habeas corpus, the inquiry is limited to the questions whether the court in which the prisoner was convicted had jurisdiction of the person of the defendant and of the crime charged, and did the court have jurisdiction to render the particular judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.