Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 OR 571 - Speer v. Smith

Speer v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1923
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Doon v. Smith · De Vall v. De Vall · McGinnis v. Studebaker · Pullen v. Eugene · Maxwell v. Bolles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The direct examination opened the doors to the inquiry sought to be made by the defendants and while it is not necessary to relate the whole record it is enough to say that under all the surrounding circumstances the limitation placed qpon the right of cross-examination was specially prejudicial to the defendants. * * He [the plaintiff] testified in general but nevertheless comprehensive language that the note had been transferred to him and that he owned it; and the defendants were entitled to ascertain the circumstances of the transfer by cross-examination. Plainly, the cross-examination attempted by the defendants would have been as to matter stated in direct examination.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.