Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 Or. App. 451 - State v. Reed

83 Or. App. 451 - State v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
15
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2007 · most notably 8 Cal. 4th 587 - People v. Leahy (1994), State v. Bresson (1990)

36 state decisions — followed in 15 states

260198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The HGN test is distinguished from other field sobriety tests in that science, rather than common knowledge, provides the legitimacy for HGN testing. [Citations.] Certain reactions to alcohol are so common that judicial notice will be taken of them; however, HGN testing does not fall into this category. [Citation.] HGN test results are `scientific evidence based on the scientific principle that consumption of alcohol causes the type of nystagmus measured by the HGN test.' [Citation.] HGN evidence could have a disproportionate impact on the jury's decisionmaking process because of the test's scientific nature and because the jury may not understand the nature of the test or the methodology of its procedure. [Citations.].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[r]hythmical oscillation of the eyeballs, either horizontal, rotary, or vertical.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.